Signup
LoginRecent Posts
-
-
HI,
I overbought tickets... also got extra open tickets for sale. I have altogether five tix... if buy all five, i will sell at just $100. If less than five, then one going for $23 each. Expiring on 12/12/08. Valide on all dates, except on the F1 dates lah.... can meet up anywhere near town... sms me at 93850222!
-
-
-
Again.Chees just tell u the half truths!!
First,I am still waiting for her explanation why she applied on 17 June,
in fact she could apply as early as 24 May.
Second,CSC dares not tell u her case was rejected because
,among other things ,her lawyer Chia Ti Lik
''filed them after the Aug 18 deadline that had been set.''
http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Courts%2Band%2BCrime/Story/STIStory_274416.html
http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/news/singapore/1015-judge-avoids-deciding-on-oas-actions
This simple oversight just fails her case.Full Stop.
I have tell u many times,as Opposition,never make mistakes.
But who knows what is or are the real cause of this mistake?
Intenional or just pure over sight?
2.CSC still owes us explanation why did she apply for travel so late
She sould apply,if i am correct,2 months before travel. (the scheduled Standford
seminar in ''United States for the period from 28th July 2008 till 15th August 2008''.)
I think she could apply as early as 24 May 2008.
But she only applied on 17 June!!Why so late,Miss Chee?
Sequences of the case
1.''Application decisions (of Stanford Summer programme)
will be available no later than the first week of March, 2008''(Stanford web site)
2.But she applied on 17 June to OA for travel.(http://www.zaobao.com/sp/sp080801_513.shtml) vs could apply as early as 24 May 2008.
3.OA gave her reply for second appeal on 11 July.
4.Stanford's offer of honorarium was dated 22 July.
Pl read my above posting.
4.CSC posted 3 postings dated July 23,25 and 28.
On 23 July posting,she pretended that she did not know the
offer of honorarium dated 22 July.
5.11 August hearing
Chee version:
The hearing was initially fixed on 11 Aug 08. However, Judge Tan told Mr Chia Ti Lik, who was arguing for Ms Chee that the papers were not properly served on the Attorney General and that the wording of the OS lacked clarity.
The Judge then set another date for the hearing to be reconvened -- a full three weeks later on 1 Sep 08.In CSC words,Judge is always wrong.The seminar is scheduled end on 15 Aug.
In fact,the 11 Aug hearing was purely academic also!!
STimes version
A hearing took place on Aug 11, but proceedings were adjourned at Ms Chee's request as she had just engaged Mr Chia as her lawyer and he needed more time to prepare for the case.
6.Why did Judge refuse to review
Chees version
When the hearing resumed on 1 Sep, Judge Tan said that it was purely an "academic" exercise for him to rule on Ms Chee's application because the fellowship period was over. He thus dismissed the OS.
OS=Originating Summons
STimes version
Besides few other factors,
On Monday, Mr Chia also complained that Ms Chee was not given the right to reply as the court had previously rejected documents he wanted to file. But he admitted that this was because he had filed them after the Aug 18 deadline that had been set.
The Court see no new document and rejected the Review.
Dear learned lawyers in Singapore,pl learn and attend course
------write the right stuffs
------submit in right manners,in right place and before the dead line!!
Will Law Society organise some new courses for new birds as
well as old dogs!!!
BTW,u may be sued for negligences next time.
This time is just pure luck.
Learn a good lesson and move on.Good Luck---next time!!
-
-
-
Originally posted by kopiosatu:
wah crap! i just remembered that i have to monitor my own IPPT status now.
gotta book once birthday is over!
I ORD-ed on 30th June 2004.
The thing is, my birthday is on 25th June.
In short.... from 30th Jun 2004 to 25th June 2005 (almost one year), they didn't bother me for IPPT.
-
-
-
hey SBS8033D, if ur clone is SBS8031J or vice-versa, just admit it and stop posting all those nonsense just to increase ur post count. things are getting very complicated in this thread due to this issue. just get this matter clear and i hope that everyone can remain united as a bus enthusiast family.
-
-
-
Why parents need to intervene: see another thread
-
-
-
Looking for nice peoples willing to learn together play together and have fun dotaing together.As you know Bnet world = Leavers Inhse game = fun teasing each others ,training each other to improve better, learning tag team combo together protecting each others of course,noob is ok, this Clan Rules No1: Dont be rude to other clan mates(got anything unhappy whisper me let me know dont influence others mood), No2: No map hacker(pointless) No3: be active when i'm myself or clan mates jio for inhse.
FAQ, peoples may ask what is this clan stand for ! Well let me explain it short and sweet,this xYx is form because quite a few of us have been in xyx for long time as in few years already, one day we all decided to form this clan,main objective is to find nice peoples around in bnet world & we already getting sick of this bnet world due to LEAVERS and too much immatures players already making nusiance to others making the fun mood became bad mood, so i decided to form this clan for inhse game only.
i am looking for mature players. No childish players and try to rebel against shaman. During our inhse, we expect no quarrel, If you ever suspect someone who mh, you can approach us or other shaman. Noobs or Pro are all allowed. No flaming at all. Well, me, WateryBaka, is a shaman of Clan XYX. There is no full form of XYX. Our clan most likely available in private channel in bnet- CLAN XYX. We hopefully wish to recieve Active, Mature Players with good attitude.
Btw Peoples, this clan is from singapore and its from loaderon. As our clan got some good dota players, we maybe will be deciding to form competitive teams for competition or clan mates! Well now we hav few ally clan- Clan Vex, Clan AGM, Clan exos, Clan Fat1. And We will be organising a end-year Chalet. We hopefully wish to see most of us turn up.
We will kindly introduce you to our clan mates and will make friends with you.If you are interested, Kindly contact me through my email=(x1a0sh3ng_rox@hotmail.com) its MSN though.
Thanks and good luck you all of dota players!
-
-
-
Sep 8, 2008Matchmaking meet
They share CVs to find mates for their children at first such event here By Goh Chin Lian
Parents took matters into their own hands, saying their children were too busy for a social life. -- ST PHOTO: ASHLEIGH SIMWITH a picture of her son in her handbag, housewife Wang Lianzhi mingled with some 150 parents at the Speakers' Corner yesterday for a mass matchmaking session.'My son's 30. He's never had a girlfriend. He's working on his computer all the time and seldom goes out,' explained Mrs Wang, 67.
So she decided to play Cupid, distributing his business card to other parents.
It was the first parents' matchmaking session, organised by dating agency Clique Wise which had taken up a suggestion by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.
PM Lee had floated the idea of having parents play matchmaker for their children in his National Day Rally speech last month.
He described how thousands of parents in Beijing secretly sought out spouses for their children at such sessions, commonly held in parks, and suggested Singapore parents try it too.
Yesterday, they did. Parents took matters into their own hands, saying their children were too busy for a social life.
Many like Mrs May Jow, 60, came without their children's knowledge. 'I took my daughter's photograph from the drawer without telling her,' she said.
The matchmaking process was simple: Parents exchanged details of their children like age, education and current job, and asked to see a picture of the 'candidate'. Some whipped out passport-sized photographs, others 4R-sized pictures. One parent came with an 8R computer printout of the family posing with the candidate in a graduation gown.
Parents were not only scrutinising the candidate's looks, but also sussing out the candidate's parents to see if they came from similar backgrounds. If all goes well, they exchange phone numbers.
Some parents like Mrs Jow were on the lookout for candidates who matched their children's height and age.
'The age difference should be about three to four years and he has to be at least 1.76m tall,' said Mrs Jow, whose daughter is aged 30 and is 1.68m tall.
Parents hunting for a son-in-law also wanted someone with a higher educational qualification and a stable career.
Said housewife L.H. Heng, 55: 'My daughter has a polytechnic diploma. Her spouse cannot have any lesser than that.'
The session's organiser, Ms Lydia Gan, said the event was held at Speakers' Corner as the older generation was familiar with Hong Lim Park. It was also free.
All Ms Gan had to do was register online with the National Parks Board, since rules were eased to allow outdoor demonstrations at Speakers' Corner from Sept 1.
While the matchmaking session was registered as an exhibition, and not a demonstration, it did draw onlookers like odd job labourer Jeff Tan, 60. He had dropped by after shopping in nearby Chinatown, thinking he would catch a protest in progress.
But there was none. So far, only non-profit group Hearer of Cries has held a demonstration, staging a 10-minute protest against employers who abuse maids.
Mr Tan said: 'I wouldn't come here specially. I work in Changi and I'm living in Tampines. It's too far.'
-
.. made with durian??